Skip to main content

The Best Teachers are Obsessive

Think about the best teacher you've ever seen, maybe when you were at school or someone you've had the privilege to work with. Make a quick list of the skills and qualities they have?

I would take an educated guess that you listed some pretty amazing qualities such as passionate, caring, determined (or similar) and not hard skills such as organised, good time management, great subject knowledge etc.

When hiring new teachers what do you look for; subject knowledge, experience, track record of delivering results, interview performance, affordability? All of these would be valid reasons for recruiting a specific individual (in an idealistic world maybe not affordable but with recent pressures on budget this is now a reality).

I would argue that all of these are the wrong reasons to hire someone.

The people we want teaching the students in our school are the teachers similar to the one you identified at the start of this blog.

Subject knowledge can be learnt, experience can be gained, record of results can be skewed depending on the school and environment they teach in, some people talk a good game in interview and some people are willing to make themselves affordable for the right job. None of these guarantee the end result of hiring an amazing practitioner. 

Here's the problem: we like to quantify what we see in order to assess it. It's what we do on a day to day basis as a teacher and it's what senior leaders try and do to the workforce through lesson observations, learning walks, book scrutinise, etc. The thinking goes: if we can measure it, we can improve it. 

As Damian Hughes states in his investigation into workplace culture "we're all bad at judging talent because we instinctively tend to overrate the visible stuff (performance), and underrate the invisible stuff we call 'character'- namely work habits, competitiveness, ambition and grit - which turn out to be far more important in the long run".

If we want the best teachers in the classrooms of our schools we must seek out and hire the most obsessive teachers. The teachers who have all, of the work habits listed below (in no particular order):

Grit
Ambition
Determination
Passion
Empathy
Humility
Coachability
Competitiveness
High emotional intelligence

These teachers are the ones who will demonstrate the obsessive nature that is required to create dynamic and engaging lessons that stretch and challenge all students that they teach. 

As this stage I will add one caveat- they need to know how to switch off outside of work and this should actively be encouraged by schools. The ability to leave your work at the door is an important one and will avoid inevitable burnout in these sort of teachers. The teachers I am referring to are ones who are obsessive about their work whilst they are there, not when they are at home. Top level athletes are obsessive about improving performance, but understand the importance of rest on the mental component of their performance.

Teachers who demonstrate the abilities mentioned above fit into the 'obsessive' mould that I am referring to. They will stop at nothing to support their students. They will engage in further school life (extra curricular, etc), they will help develop colleagues, they will have an ongoing focus on self development and they will be humble enough to accept responsibility for mistakes and plot a path to correct these.

Here's the problem- it's really difficult to judge these characteristics in interview. However, if school leaders are passionate about making your school a truly outstanding one then they must figure out a way of doing so, as the advantages of hiring obsessive teachers far out way the effort of modifying interview processes.

I'd be really interested in hearing your thoughts on this topic. Please comment below and share you opinions on what qualities make the best teachers.



Comments

  1. Interesting to read, Mike. I don't disagree with the principle, though I struggle to see the word 'obsessive' as a positive, I think. I tend to associate it with a LACK of balance and perspective. 'Highly committed' is what I think I looked for as a head, and I think there are ways you can gauge this, if you're astute, through the selection process. It's about tuning in to who they are and what they believe, not just what they have done.

    And I absolutely agree that although you want this degree of commitment and care, you also want professionals who are capable of achieving a healthy and sustainable balance in their lives, and I know that can be a challenge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the feedback Jill. I take on board your comments.

      When writing this I had a sporting example in my head which was Cristiano Ronaldo. He's obsessed with being the best, yet he's still successful and does find balance between work and relaxation. There are other athletes out there who are highly committed, but to be the absolute best they have to switch that mindset into a healthy obsession.

      Totally agree about looking at who someone is during interview and not just what they've done.

      Thank you for taking the time to read my blog- it's greatly appreciated.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can We Actually Make Lesson Observations Supportive?

Most teachers get nervous about observation lessons. Whether the school agrees with grading lessons or not, the teacher feels as if they are being judged on a very small snapshot of their working practice. Most senior leaders overseeing teaching and learning (myself included) talk about the need for lesson observations to be ‘non-judgmental’ and ‘supportive’. Lesson observations have been around for decades (or long before my time at least!) and I guarantee that the first time a school completed them it was focused on making sure people were doing their jobs correctly. The process, by its nature, is judgmental. It’s about accountability. The problem is that over the past decade schools have looked to sell the process as one of support. “We are going to help you identify areas for development and then put a CPD programme in place to help you” to most teachers this actually means “We are going to judge you, give you a chance to improve, and then judge you again”. It doesn’t...

Let Middle Leaders Own Their Meetings

How effective and engaging are your Middle Leaders meetings? Are you excited to attend them and have an input into whole school decision making or do they feel like a burden that gets in the way of you making a real impact? In my experience of being either a Middle Leader or Senior Leader in a number of different schools (2 state comprehensives in the UK and now an International School in Thailand) the answer would be 'not very'. The way these meetings normally run is this: Senior Leaders set the agenda and use it as a consultancy process with Middle Leaders, generally guiding them towards a route that has already been discussed in SLT meetings. The Senior Leaders get the outcome they want and the Middle Leaders leave happy in the illusion that they've had an input and have had their voice heard. This may not always be the case, but as I've said previously, this is my experience of these meetings. As a Senior Leader it's important to create a following amo...